Phillip Jordan vs Benjamin Willwerth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Jordan vs B. Willwerth

Phillip Jordan
USA
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
18
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Benjamin Willwerth
USA
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
18
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Jordan 1 - 0 Willwerth
They have played 2 sets in total, with Phillip Jordan winning 2 and Benjamin Willwerth winning 0. The last match between Phillip Jordan and Benjamin Willwerth was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Phillip Jordan getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jordan | 1 |
| Willwerth | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Naples(02-19-25)
Phillip Jordan
6
7
Benjamin Willwerth
4
6
P. Jordan vs B. Willwerth H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.29% (57-36) | Career Total W/L | 35.00% (7-13) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Jordan vs B. Willwerth Match Preview:
- Recent Form Analysis: In the past six months, there has been a notable discrepancy in the performance of Willwerth and Jordan regarding the success of their second serves. Willwerth has managed to secure victory in 42.28% of points on their second serve, whereas Jordan has displayed a superior record, triumphing in 56.96% of similar opportunities. It is worth acknowledging the strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of predictions made for tennis matches.
- Return Game Statistics: Turning our attention to return game statistics, we observe that Willwerth, in recent times, has proven adept at capitalizing on their opponent's second serve points, winning an impressive 55.05% of these encounters. Conversely, Jordan has also displayed proficiency in this regard, claiming victory in 55.35% of similar opportunities. The statistics for first serve returns reveal Willwerth attaining success in 32.86% of cases and Jordan in 39.26%. These figures possess a profound significance in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Analysis of Performance under Pressure: When scrutinizing the ability of these players to cope with pressure, we find that Willwerth has demonstrated a resilient character by successfully saving 57.45% of breakpoints during recent competition. Jordan has also exhibited commendable resolve, preserving 55.75% of similar breakpoint situations. This particular statistic holds crucial import when making predictions for in-game betting.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Examining the broader context, it is evident that Willwerth has achieved victories in 66.67% of matches played within the last year, amassing a record of 4 wins and 2 losses. Meanwhile, Jordan stands marginally ahead, boasting a success rate of 67.44% with a record of 29 wins and 14 losses. This holistic analysis provides a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head encounter.
- Assessment of Preferred Playing Surfaces: By delving into their career statistics, we discover that Willwerth performs most admirably on clay courts, where they have secured triumph in a remarkable 75% of matches. However, their performance on indoor hard courts falters relatively, with a win percentage of only 50%. In contrast, Jordan's most favorable surface is indoor hard courts, where they have achieved victory in 69% of matches played. Conversely, their win percentage on clay courts is less encouraging, standing at 40%.
- Player Level Analysis: Over the past year, Willwerth has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize ceiling of $10K, prevailing in 66.67% of matches played. By comparison, Jordan has primarily participated in the same category of tournaments, triumphing in a slightly higher percentage of matches at 67.44%. It is essential to take these factors into account when assessing the favorite in this matchup, as statistics must be considered relative to the level of competition in which players have been engaged.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the preceding 12 months, the opponents faced by Willwerth have maintained an average ranking of 422, whereas Jordan has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 212.67. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered and potentially influence predictions.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those with an inclination toward live predictions and betting, the behavior of players in deciding sets serves as a key indicator. Willwerth has exhibited admirable confidence in such circumstances, emerging victorious in 75% of deciding sets contested over the past year. Conversely, Jordan's performance in this area has been less consistent, winning only 33% of deciding sets in all matches played on the professional circuit.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical player performance is invaluable for predicting outcomes, it is equally important to observe current event statistics to gauge the form of players during ongoing tournaments. Please refer to the section below to ascertain the performance of these players in the current event. It is noteworthy that certain players display better form on specific occasions, and this must be factored into the outcome assessment.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Willwerth has demonstrated a proficiency for converting breakpoint opportunities, successfully capitalizing on 43.86% of such crucial moments. Jordan also displays composure in this aspect, converting 43.02% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you have an interest in models that predict tennis match outcomes, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Please note: This resource is intended for avid followers of statistical analysis.)
Phillip Jordan vs Benjamin Willwerth Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Jordan vs B. Willwerth H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:55:51 | Average Match Time | 1:55:51 |
| 71% (54/76) | 1st Serve % | 68% (46/68) |
| 65% (35/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (31/46) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 44% (30/68) | Return Points Win % | 42% (32/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jordan 51%, Willwerth 47%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jordan 54%, Willwerth 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Jordan 52%, Willwerth 53%.
P. Jordan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
B. Willwerth Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-7(3) 7-6(1) 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | ||

P. Jordan vs B. Willwerth Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.29% (57/36) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 62.14% (128/78) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.38% (21/31) |
| 55.38% (1075/866) | Games Win/Loss | 47.24% (240/268) |
| 63.33% (38/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 61.54% (16/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 113 | Aces Total | 63 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 118 | Total Double Faults | 34 |
| 1:9:36 | Average Match Time | 1:52:50 |
| 218.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.1 |
| 64% (2392/3722) | 1st Serve % | 65% (1011/1556) |
| 63% (1507/2392) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (655/1011) |
| 53% (707/1330) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (249/545) |
| 41% (196/483) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (64/163) |
| 43% (1778/4132) | Return Points Win % | 39% (624/1583) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 61.29% (57/36) | Futures W/L | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 62% (57/92) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (17/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 35% (7/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 92% (59/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 56% (9/5) |
| 8% (59/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 44% (9/4) |
| 9% (34/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (11/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 20 Dec, 08:00 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 11:30 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 09:00 PM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 11:30 AM
PredictionSat, 20 Dec, 11:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Landaluce H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Kjaer Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Learner Tien
Nishesh Basavareddy
Alexander Blockx
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Shruti Ahlawat
Ksenia Efremova
Sohyun Park
Mariia Tkacheva
Mio Mushika
Tahlia KokkinisSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
21:00
H2H 1-0
19:00
H2H 0-0
08:00
H2H 0-0
08:00
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0